Updates from November, 2012 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • kubke 21:08 on November 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    2012.11.28: Busy (but productive) days 

    It’s been a few busy days – dealing with having to finish fixing the embryos on Monday, which took hours! And the smell of egg yolk just sticks in my nose for almost an entire day. Made much progress though. We managed to get a second order of eggs in, so that should give me enough stuff to do for a while. We also had a meeting about the Open Research Conference in February, that is moving along nicely, and had another chat about the SciFund project. Managed to get all the compliance corrections for the HRC grants in to the research office too, so good luck with that. I accepted two manuscripts to edit, one from PLOS ONE and one for PEERJ, and then a lot of other bits and pieces that just keep popping up. I also managed to do some cool stuff I want to add to my continuation application, and of course Tuesday night was Manaiakalani night.

    We also had a lab meeting Tuesday, it has been ages since we had one, and planned the work for the summer. So here is the plan:

    Need to get the intracellular physiology rig up and running again. We need to get the amplifier that one of our colleagues borrowed, and then it will be trying to sort out the programming in LabView to get it to do what I want. That will take a bit of time.
    We need to get the comparative histology stuff up and running too, so that we can build the 3D models of the brain – lots of bits and pieces to put together, a bit tedious, but looking forward to it.
    I need to get the nerve labels in the embryos I need so I can finally publish that paper
    I need to finish writing the other 3 papers I am writing

    So it will be a busy summer.
    Oh and yay! Got accepted to the Women in Leadership programme!

    All and all a good week so far.

     
  • kubke 11:01 on November 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , storytelling   

    Storytelling workshop at #kiwifoo12: Set the scene. Introduce characters. Begin the journey. Encounter obstacle. Overcome. Resolve story.

    (https://twitter.com/fogonwater/status/168466479858196480)
     
  • kubke 20:35 on November 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply  

    So apparently co-investigator is not sufficiently descriptive for my collaborator in the HRC grant. Wut?!

     
  • kubke 21:44 on November 20, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    2012.11.20: Software mystery solved 

    I had this nagging feeling all evening yesterday about the software mis-reporting the injected current by a factor of 4. It seemed an odd number to built into the software – for some reason I might not be troubled if it was a factor of 10, 100 or whatever, but 4? It also seemed odd that the error would only show up in one mode but not the other…
    Anyway, I went to talk to the student to try to understand what was going on, and it turns out that at some point she needs to enter some sort of scaling value when she calibrates the system, and that is when all pieces fell into place. To enter the numbers she uses the numerical keypad at the right of the keyboard – and “4” is right on top of “1”. Well, it was the source of some laughter – and she did indeed say she had to change her scaling value from something lile 0.4 to 0.1 when she recalibrated yesterday. Problem solved. It seems it all came down to a slippy finger on the keyboard.

    But there was still the issue that her input resistances seemed a bit too high – so back to google scholar. Many papers report that they monitor the input resistance but don’t provide actual values. Then it dawned on me, as long as they show an image of a cell where they show the voltage trace we can estimate it by measuring with a ruler from the figure. And so with that new incentive she came back with a list of values from the literature. Oh my, they are all over the place, and it does not seem to matter whether they are recorded with patch or sharp electrodes. So we tried to figure out what was going on and she noticed that the time at which the steady voltage was measured varied between papers. So that might be it – is it possible they are measuring while some hyperpolarisation current is still active? So I asked her to remeasure how her estimates of Rm might vary depending on whether she measured at the end of her current pulse (as she does) or earlier in the trace. I guess I will find out tomorrow.

    In the meantime, as we were discussing all this we got into a bit of a discussion as to what was the best way to measure Rm. It became kind of funny, because we both do it slightly different and it seemed that it was the blind leading the blind for a wee while, until we realised that we were looking at the problem from a slightly different point of view, and in fact we were both right. What was good, though, is that it challenged me to think whether I could be wrong. Happy to learn I wasn’t!

    I also had the board of exmainers meeting today, but maybe I will talk about it tomorrow.
    And no, I have not done my dishes yet! Agh!

     
  • kubke 20:17 on November 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    2012.11.19: One more reason not to just trust your software! 

    Another busy day – Meeting with student I am co-supervising, trying to get the HRC grant in, getting the eggs ready, and dealing with the conference organisation.

    The meeting with student went well. Turns out, she comes to me afterwards puzzled that her input resistances are different in voltage and current clamp modes, and the ones in current clamp mode turn out to look nothing realistic. I suggested that she should repeat her experiments (in both modes) with a model cell, since what she described sounded to me like the software was off by an order or magnitude or something – though it was weird that the problem would only be there in one of the modes. Anyway, she did this and was skipping with joy when realising pClamp was off by a factor of 4 (whatever she meant by that).

    Sort of timely given my recent blog post (http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2012/11/15/failure-to-replicate-as-an-opportunity-from-learning-2). And underscores what I always say: do not trust software, not even commercial software! test test test and make sure software does what it says it does. When I think about it, time to look to see if anyone else has noticed this and whether some of the publications using pclamp are off!!!! Oh my…..

    Glad that puzzle has been sorted.

    Anyway, eggs are set, and should start fixing embryos on Friday – must remember to finish doing the dishes

     
  • kubke 16:48 on November 18, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    2012.11.18: Sunday Grant Writing 

    After the demands of last week, getting the paper with Felipe et al. submitted, dealing with marking and submitting final grades, visiting Leigh to assess whether we should have the workshop there, and all the rest that keeps popping up, I can’t but be grateful to the Research Office for letting me hand in the grants on Monday – I think this was the second extension. I really needed it, and the awful weather in Auckland is a great incentive to stay indoors under a warm blanket and with a cuppa.

    I have to say, I am liking what the two grants look like, and hope they fare better than previous attempts. I am submitting to the HRC Explorer – if you get in through the door, then they will pick probably 3 at random. Given the 5% funding that my section got on the last round of Marsden, this seems like a much better deal.

    I must make sure not to play the lotto for a while, don’t want to waste my luck. Oh, wait – independent events. :)

     
  • kubke 21:48 on November 17, 2012 Permalink | Reply  

    There are few things as satisfying as getting notice of a paper being sent in for review.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel